29 Jul

MSHA publishes proposed rule on civil penalty assessments


 

 

07/29/2014

MSHA publishes proposed rule on civil penalty assessments

Proposal simplifies process, improves consistency with emphasis on more serious conditions

ARLINGTON, Va. — The U.S. Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration announced today it will publish a proposed rule that would amend its existing civil penalty regulations by simplifying the criteria for assessing health and safety violations and increasing emphasis on more serious safety and health conditions, thus providing improved safety and health for miners. The proposed rule will be published in the Federal Register on July 31.

“This proposed rule would simplify the process and increase consistency, objectivity and efficiency in the citations and orders that inspectors issue. Furthermore, it would facilitate improved compliance and early resolution of enforcement issues,” said Joseph A. Main, assistant secretary of labor for mine safety and health.

MSHA’s proposal is structured to encourage operators to be more accountable and proactive in addressing safety and health conditions at their mines. Under the proposal, total penalties proposed by MSHA and the distribution of the penalty amount by mine size would remain generally the same; however, the penalty amount for small metal and nonmetal mines would decrease. The existing minimum penalty of $112 and the maximum penalty of $70,000 for non-flagrant violations would not change, but minimum penalties for unwarrantable failure violations — that is, violations that constitute more than just ordinary negligence — would increase to provide a greater deterrent for mine operators who allow these violations to occur.

In early 2010, Main testified before Congress about the growing backlog of contested civil penalty cases. Among the solutions he proposed was making the evaluation and writing of citations simpler, more objective, clear and consistent. The following year, President Obama issued an Executive Order requiring agencies to review and simplify their regulations. The proposed rule is responsive to those concerns.

“MSHA has implemented a number of initiatives to encourage mine operators to find and fix conditions and practices that could lead to violations, and we believe those efforts have led to improved safety and health conditions in mines,” said Main. “The number of violations cited by MSHA has decreased, as has the backlog of contested cases. The proposed rule will improve the civil penalty process, and we welcome comments from the entire mining community.”

29 Jul

Darryl Howes Farms ordered to pay back wages to 36 migrant workers to resolve US Department of Labor lawsuit


July 14, 2014

Farm operation previously ordered to stop misclassifying migrant workers

 

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. — Copemish employer Darryl Howes, doing business as Darryl Howes Farms, signed a consent judgment under which he agreed to pay $11,253 in back wages to 36 migrant workers to resolve a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Department of Labor. Howes has agreed to implement enhanced record-keeping procedures to ensure the business complies with the record-keeping provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The consent judgment resolves a federal lawsuit filed by the department alleging minimum wage, record-keeping and housing violations and alleges that Howes unlawfully interfered with the Wage and Hour Division’s investigation. The Wage and Hour Division’s investigation revealed that Darryl Howes Farms misclassified its migrant agricultural workers as independent contractors rather than employees entitled to minimum wage and other protections of the FLSA and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act. The back wages due must be paid within 10 days of the consent judgment being entered by the court.

“This consent judgment sends a clear message to farm operations that denying workers their rightfully earned wages by misclassifying them as independent contractors will not be tolerated, and that wage laws will be enforced,” said Mary O’Rourke, district director for the Wage and Hour Division in Grand Rapids. “The department is committed to protecting the many low-wage migrant workers who deserve the wages they earn.”

In earlier case proceedings, U.S. District Judge Gordon J. Quist issued an opinion and order that upheld the department’s findings of record-keeping and housing violations during the 2011 harvest at Howes’ 60-acre cucumber farm and migrant housing camp. The court ruled previously that Howes provided substandard housing to migrant workers at a housing camp he controlled, in violation of the MSPA. The violations at the housing camp included failures to provide adequate shelter; to prevent insect or pest infestation; to remove standing wastewater; to repair broken screen doors and showers; and to maintain toilets in a sanitary condition. The court ordered Howes to ensure all MSPA housing he owns or controls complies with the MSPA. The court previously held that Howes interfered with the department’s investigation by impeding the department’s confidential interviews with his employees.

The Wage and Hour Division enforces the MSPA, which protects migrant and seasonal agricultural workers by establishing employment standards related to wages, housing, transportation, disclosures and record keeping. The division also enforces the FLSA, which requires covered employers to pay nonexempt farm workers at least the federal minimum wage for all hours worked.

29 Jul

H-1B Debarred/Disqualified Employers

What is a “willful violator employer”?
“Willful violator” or “willful violator employer,” means an employer that meets all of the following standards:

  • A finding of violation by the employer is entered in either of the following two types of enforcement proceeding:
    1. A Department of Labor proceeding under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) § 212(n)(2); (8 U.S.C. § 1182(n)(2)(C); or
    2. A Department of Justice proceeding under INA § 212(n)(5); (8 U.S.C.§ 1182(n)(5).)
  • The agency (DOL) finds that the employer has committed either a willful failure or a misrepresentation of a material fact (two of the Labor Condition Application (LCA) attestations; and
  • DOL’s finding is entered on or after October 21, 1998.

A willful violator employer must comply with additional attestations under any LCA it files within five years of the willful violation finding. The only exception is when an LCA is filed for and used exclusively for exempt H-1B workers (see WH Fact Sheet #62Q).
Willful violators and H-1B-dependent employers (see WH Fact Sheet #62C) which file an LCA must meet the following additional requirements:
The employer has not displaced a U.S. worker at the time of filing an H-1B visa petition (see WH Fact Sheet #62N);

Before placing an H-1B worker at a secondary employer’s work site, the employer has inquired as to the secondary employer’s intent to displace a U.S. worker (see WH Fact Sheet #62N);

  • The employer has taken good faith steps to recruit U.S. workers (see WH Fact Sheets #62O and #62P); and
  • The employer has offered the job to any equally or better qualified U.S. worker who applies for the job for which the H-1B worker is sought (see WH Fact Sheets #62O and #62P).

Willful violators are subject to random investigations by the Department of Labor for a period of up to five years from the date that the employer is determined to be a willful violator. The Wage and Hour Division maintains a current list of such H-1B willful violators.

 

H-1B Debarred/Disqualified List of Employers

Employer Name Willful Violator Debarment Period
3A Technologies, Inc. YES 2/1/2013
3780 Rochester Rd. to
Suite 105 1/31/2015
Troy, MI 48083


Amreli Technology Solutions LLC YES 1/31/2014
and Atul Hipara, to
an individual 1/30/2016
17530 NE Union Hill Rd.
Redmond, WA  98052


ASAP America, LLC YES 7/31/2013
d/b/a ASAP America to
1501 US Highway 441, 7/30/2015
North, Suite 1706
The Villages, FL  32159


Asterix Consulting Inc. NO 5/30/2013
and Pasapula Jaganmohan Ram to
303 5th Avenue Ste 1301 5/29/2014
New York, NY 10016


DTP, LLC YES 12/10/2013
d/b/a Digital Transaction to
Processing 12/9/2015
and Himanshu Shekhar,
an individual
16000 Christensen Road
Suite 130
Seattle, WA  98188


EnterSoft Solutions, Inc. YES 5/25/2012
370 Convention Way to
Suite 3023 5/24/2014
Redwood City, CA 94063
iFuturistics, Inc. YES 3/20/2013
315 Main Street, to
Suite A 3/19/2015
Pineville, NC 28134


Infinitum, Inc. YES 2/1/2013
15 Constitution Drive, to
Suite 165 1/31/2015
Bedford, NH 03110
Jai Mataji, LLC YES 10/29/2013
d/b/a The Country Store to
1206 Piedmount Hwy. 10/28/2015
Cedartown, GA  30125


Life Nutritionales LLC YES 7/31/2013
d/b/a Life Nutritionales to
1501 US Highway 441, 7/30/2015
North, Suite 1706
The Villages, FL  32159


MG Globalsoft, LLC YES 2/1/2013
32580 Grand River Avenue to
Room 7 1/31/2015
Farmington, MI 48336


NetXert, Inc. YES 11/30/2012
3915 Research Park Drive to
Suite A-1 11/29/2014
Ann Arbor, MI 48108


Oshima Saito LLP YES 11/30/2012
and Joe Oshima, Individually to
509 5th Avenue, 11/29/2014
6th Floor
New York, NY 11377


Pal-Do Company Inc. YES 2/1/2013
9601 S. Tacoma Way to
Lakewood, WA 98499


1/31/2015
RP Consultants, Inc. NO 4/15/2013
d/b/a Net Matrix Solutions, Inc. to
10235 W. Little York Road 4/14/2014
Suite 435
Houston, TX 77040


Rudell & Associates, Inc. YES 10/29/2013
and Rodolfo Quiambao, to
an individual 10/28/2015
11-11 40th Avenue
Long Island City, NY


11101
Supreme Tech Solutions, LLC YES 12/31/2013
(Krios Technology Group LLC) to
8306-B Old Courthouse Road 12/30/2015
Vienna, VA  22182


Usnets Systems, Inc. YES 5/25/2012
and Sayed Hussain to
President, an individual 5/24/2014
860 US Highway 1
Edison, NJ 08817


U.S. Rehab Services, P.C. NO 1/31/2014
555 South Mission Street to
Mount Pleasant, MI 48858


1/30/2015
Vulcan Capital Management Inc. YES 6/27/2013
and Ford Graham, individually to
75 Rockfeller Plaza, 6/26/2015
18th Floor
New York, NY 10022


Worldwide Software Services, Inc. YES 8/24/2012
1001 2nd Avenue North to
Clinton, IA 52732 8/23/2014

*This list is effective as of March 31, 2014.

27 Jul

Jobs Created During Each Presidency Term

U.S. president Party Term years Start jobs End jobs Created jobs Ave annual increase
Barack Obama D 2009–2013 133,631,000 134,839,000 1,208,000 0.23%
George W. Bush R 2005–2009 132,502,000 133,631,000 1,129,000 0.21%
George W. Bush R 2001–2005 132,466,000 132,453,000 -13,000 0.00%
Bill Clinton D 1997–2001 121,231,000 132,466,000 11,233,000 2.24%
Bill Clinton D 1993–1997 109,725,000 121,233,000 11,507,000 2.52%
George H. W. Bush R 1989–1993 107,133,000 109,726,000 2,593,000 0.60%
Ronald Reagan R 1985–1989 96,353,000 107,133,000 10,780,000 2.69%
Ronald Reagan R 1981–1985 91,031,000 96,353,000 5,322,000 1.43%
Jimmy Carter D 1977–1981 80,692,000 91,031,000 10,339,000 3.06%
Nixon/Ford R 1973–1977 75,620,000 80,692,000 5,072,000 1.64%
Richard Nixon R 1969–1973 69,438,000 75,620,000 6,182,000 2.16%
Lyndon Johnson D 1965–1969 59,583,000 69,438,000 9,855,000 3.90%
Kennedy / Johnson D 1961–1965 53,683,000 59,583,000 5,900,000 2.64%
Dwight Eisenhower R 1957–1961 52,888,000 53,683,000 795,000 0.37%
Dwight Eisenhower R 1953–1957 50,145,000 52,888,000 2,743,000 1.34%
Harry Truman D 1949–1953 44,675,000 50,145,000 5,470,000 2.93%
Roosevelt / Truman D 1945–1949 41,903,000 44,675,000 2,772,000 1.61%
Franklin Roosevelt D 1941–1945 34,480,000 41,903,000 7,423,000 5.00%
Franklin Roosevelt D 1937–1941 31,200,000 34,480,000 3,280,000 2.53% **
Franklin Roosevelt D 1933–1937 25,700,000 31,200,000 5,500,000 4.97% **
Herbert Hoover R 1929–1933 32,100,000 25,700,000 -6,400,000 -5.41% **
Calvin Coolidge R 1925–1929 29,500,000 32,100,000 2,600,000 2.13% **
Harding / Coolidge R 1921–1925 25,000,000 29,500,000 4,500,000 4.23% **
**Approximate, as of December 2013

 


The table represents the number of US jobs created or lost during the years of each presidents’ term. Sometimes these numbers are debated:they include only non-farm payroll employment, which excludes certain types of jobs, notably the self-employed. However, as a semi-balancing factor, they count one person with two jobs as two employed persons. Another factor to consider is population growth, which provides opportunities for the creation of jobs, rendering these figures less impressive.
JOB DESCRIPTION: This step is a beginning of the process and it must be provided to the SWA when requesting a prevailing wage information. PREVAILING WAGE: Employer is not permitted to offer a wage rate lower than the prevailing wage rate. RECRUITMENT SOURCES: Job posting in SWA: Employer is obligated to place a job order with the SWA serving the area of designated employment. The 30 day job order timeframe must end at least 30 days prior to filing. Online job posting: We are able to offer you discounts on placing a postings on an online job board. We collaborate with many job board owners and receive special discounts, which are passed on directly to you. Printed media job posting: Most employers, based on their normal recruiting efforts, will be able to readily identify those newspapers (or journals for certain professional positions) that are most likely to bring responses from able, willing, qualified, and available U.S. workers.Employment firm: Since an employment agency is a subsidiary of or company, this service discount is definitely considerable.

24 Jul

PERM Advertising Content


Does the job location address need to be included in the advertisement?

No, the address does not need to be included. However, advertisements must indicate the geographic area of employment with enough specificity to apprise applicants of any travel requirements and where applicants will likely have to reside to perform the job opportunity. Employers are not required to specify the job site, unless the job site is unclear; for example, if applicants must respond to a location other than the job site (e.g., company headquarters in another state) or if the employer has multiple job sites.

Does the employer’s address need to be included in the advertisement?

No, the employer’s physical address does not need to be included in the advertisement. Employers may designate a central office or post office box to receive resumes from applicants, provided the advertisement makes clear where the work will be performed.

Does the offered wage need to be included in the advertisements?

No, the offered wage does not need to be included in the advertisement, but if a wage rate is included, it can not be lower than the prevailing wage rate.

Why must the advertisement medium be different in order for advertisements to be counted as additional steps? For instance why is it not permissible to count advertisements on two separate web sites as two steps or to place a third advertisement in the same newspaper of general circulation rather than using a local or ethnic publication and have it count as an additional step?

As with all the recruitment requirements, the purpose of requiring the employer to use three additional recruitment steps is to ensure that the greatest number of able, willing, qualified, and available U.S. workers are apprised of the job opportunity. It should be noted that each of the steps may target slightly different applicant populations. Using at least three of the additional steps normally used by businesses to recruit workers is a means of apprising a greater number of U.S. applicants of the job opportunity and more adequately substantiates an employer’s claim there are no available U.S. workers for the job offer.

24 Jul

PERM Position Job Description


What level of detail regarding the job offer must be included in the advertisement?

Employers need to apprise applicants of the job opportunity.
The regulation does not require employers to run advertisements enumerating every job duty, job requirement, and condition of employment.
As long as the employer can demonstrate a logical nexus between the advertisement and the position listed on the employer’s application, the employer will meet the requirement of apprising applicants of the job opportunity.

An advertisement that includes a description of the vacancy, the name of the employer, the geographic area of employment, and the means to contact the employer to apply may be sufficient to apprise potentially qualified applicants of the job opportunity.

NOTE: While employers will have the option to place broadly written advertisements with few details regarding job duties and requirements, they must prepare a recruitment report that addresses all minimally qualified applicants for the job opportunity.
If an employer places a generic advertisement, the employer may receive a large volume of applicants, all of whom must be addressed in the recruitment report.

Employers placing general advertisements may wish to include a job identification code or other information to assist the employer in tracking applicants to the job opportunity.

 

If the employer includes job duties and requirements in the advertisement, must they be listed on the Application for Permanent Employment Certification, ETA Form 9089, as well?

Yes, if an employer wishes to include additional information about the job opportunity, such as the minimum education and experience requirements or specific job duties, the employer may do so, provided these requirements also appear on the ETA Form 9089.

24 Jul

PERM Advertising for Professional Occupations


When advertising for a professional occupation, must the required steps, i.e., the job order, the two print advertisements, and the three additional recruitment steps be different? 

Generally, all the required steps must be different.

Steps can not be duplicated nor can one step be used to satisfy two requirements, except in the case of copies of web pages generated in conjunction with the newspaper advertisements which can serve as documentation of the use of a web site other than the employers.
For example, the employer can not count two advertisements in a local and/or ethnic newspaper, or two postings on a web site, as two steps.
Similarly, the employer can not use a professional journal in lieu of a second Sunday newspaper advertisement and then count it again as an additional “trade or professional organizations” recruitment step, or count the job order again as an additional “web site other than the employer’s” step. 

24 Jul

Professional or Nonprofessional PERM Occupations


How does an employer determine whether to advertise under the recruitment requirements for professional occupations or nonprofessional occupations?

The employer must recruit under the standards for professional occupations set forth in § 656.17(e)(1) if the occupation involved is on the list of occupations, published in Appendix A to the preamble of the final PERM regulation, for which a bachelor’s or higher degree is a customary requirement.

For all other occupations not normally requiring a bachelor’s or higher degree, employers can simply recruit under the requirements for nonprofessional occupations at § 656.17(e)(2).
Although the occupation involved in a labor certification application may be a nonprofessional occupation, the regulations do not prohibit employers from conducting more recruitment than is specified for such occupations.

Therefore, if the employer is uncertain whether an occupation is considered professional or not, the employer is advised to conduct recruitment for a professional occupation.

24 Jul

What is Permanent Labor Certification Process

The actual process for permanent labor certification varies depending upon the program being used.

The filing of applications is the responsibility of the employer, not the employee.

However, the employee can benefit from understanding the program being utilized in his/her behalf. In general, the Department of Labor (DOL) works to ensure that the admission of foreign workers to work in the U.S. will not adversely affect the job opportunities, wages and working conditions of U.S. workers. Once a permanent labor certification application has been approved by the DOL, the employer will need to seek the immigration authorization from USCIS.

24 Jul

What is Foreign Labor Certification Process

Hiring foreign workers for employment in the U.S. normally requires approval from several government agencies. In most instances, employers first seek labor certification from the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL).

Although each foreign labor certification program is unique, there are similar requirements that the employer must complete prior to the issuance of a labor certification. In general, the employer will be required to complete these basic steps to obtain a labor certification:

DFLCflowchart

 

  1. The employer must ensure that the position meets the qualifying criteria for the requested program.
  2. The employer must complete the ETA form designated for the requested program. This may include the form and any supporting documentation (e.g., job description, resume of the applicant, etc.).
  3. The employer must ensure that the wage offered equals or exceeds the prevailing wage for the occupation in the area of intended employment.
  4. The employer must ensure that the compliance issues effected upon receipt of a foreign labor certification are completely understood.
  5. The completed ETA form is submitted to the designated Department of Labor office for the requested program (e.g., SWA, processing center or the national office).
  6. The employer is notified of the determination of the Department of Labor.

Once the application is certified by DOL (approved), the employer must petition the U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for a visa. Approval of labor certificate does not guarantee a visa issuance. The Department of State (DOS) will issue an immigrant visa number to the foreign worker for U.S. entry. Applicants must also establish that they are admissible to the U.S. under the provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)

The foreign labor certification process is the responsibility of the employer, not the employee; however, the employee can benefit from understanding these programs. The actual procedures depend on the nature of the visa being requested: PermanentH-1BH-2AH-2BD-1.

17 Jul

2014 Green Card Sponsors by Work State: Texas

Rank Green Card Sponsor # of Petitions Average Salary
1 Infosys 68 $79,664
2 Ericsson 55 $91,955
3 Fort Worth Independent School District 45 $48,599
4 Verizon Communications, & All Its Subsidiaries & Affiliates 37 $89,027
5 Intel 35 $130,646
6 Hcl America 35 $102,075
7 Dallas Independent School District 34 $46,262
8 Xenosoft Technologies 28 $95,725
9 Amdocs 28 $89,821
10 Bechtel Oil, Gas & Chemicals 27 $101,661
11 Deloitte Consulting 26 $120,694
12 Dell Usa 26 $95,979
13 Cameron International 25 $90,091
14 Cggveritas Services (Us) 25 $80,512
15 Hewlett-packard Company 23 $108,781
16 American Unit 23 $88,898
17 Yash & Lujan Consulting 23 $69,161
18 At&T, And All Of Its Subsidiaries And Affiliates 22 $101,041
19 Bank Of America 21 $101,163
20 Sbm Atlantia 21 $94,991
21 Kennedy International Software 21 $90,568
22 American Information Technology 21 $83,483
23 Cisco Systems 20 $108,785
24 Oracle America 20 $102,969
25 Garland Independent School District 20 $47,775
17 Jul

2014 Green Card Sponsors by Work City: Houston, TX

Rank Green Card Sponsor Green Card Petitions Average Salary
1 Bechtel Oil, Gas & Chemicals 27 $101,661
2 Cameron International 25 $90,091
3 Cggveritas Services (Us) 25 $80,512
4 Sbm Atlantia 21 $94,991
5 Camelot Integrated Solutions 19 $80,042
6 Advent Global Solutions 14 $132,270
7 Worleyparsons Group 14 $106,668
8 Fmc Technologies 14 $93,582
9 Chevron 13 $133,568
10 Shell Oil Company 12 $131,196
11 Kbr Technical Services 12 $99,379
12 Ez2 Technologies 12 $94,460
13 Alief Independent School District 12 $56,337
14 Exxon Mobil 11 $177,490
15 Occidental Oil And Gas 11 $119,250
16 Technip Usa 11 $113,004
17 Cb&i 10 $104,082
18 Flexera Global 10 $88,123
19 Deloitte Consulting 9 $124,799
20 Halliburton Energy Services 9 $94,618
21 Foxconn Assembly 9 $45,964
22 Conocophillips Company 8 $118,520
23 Hewlett-packard Company 8 $111,548
24 Weatherford International 8 $109,432
25 National Oilwell Varco, L.p. 8 $99,396
17 Jul

2014 Top Green Card Sponsors by Country of Citizenship

Rank Citizenship Country Green Card Petitions Average Salary
1 India 25,375 $100,673
2 China 2,502 $94,512
3 South Korea 2,044 $73,024
4 Canada 1,881 $116,716
5 Philippines 1,340 $66,793
6 Mexico 1,299 $63,420
7 United Kingdom 644 $117,752
8 Taiwan 514 $84,691
9 Pakistan 509 $110,310
10 Japan 378 $82,313
11 Nepal 354 $93,685
12 Turkey 318 $98,402
13 Venezuela 312 $92,949
14 France 302 $119,771
15 Brazil 299 $97,839
16 Germany 290 $110,280
17 Israel 257 $121,889
18 Russia 254 $104,769
19 Italy 234 $100,143
20 Colombia 223 $86,070
21 Australia 174 $127,951
22 Iran 156 $88,548
23 Ecuador 150 $54,447
24 Spain 149 $112,409
24 Poland 149 $75,442
26 Malaysia 146 $93,374
27 Bangladesh 145 $89,204
28 Nigeria 144 $107,802
29 Romania 134 $100,437
30 Ukraine 131 $100,291
30 Thailand 131 $83,586
32 Indonesia 128 $86,137
33 Peru 118 $83,264
34 Ireland 111 $112,247
34 Argentina 111 $104,546
36 Singapore 105 $111,480
37 South Africa 103 $107,300
38 Lebanon 101 $135,553
39 United States Of America 95 $85,525
40 Sri Lanka 93 $91,954
41 Egypt 92 $114,707
42 Jamaica 84 $68,479
43 Netherlands 78 $110,343
44 Vietnam 77 $86,602
45 Hong Kong 72 $88,991
46 Bulgaria 70 $97,616
47 Greece 69 $120,764
47 Guatemala 69 $49,052
49 Jordan 68 $122,743
50 Syria 67 $143,320
17 Jul

Top H1B Visa Sponsors by Work City

Rank Work City Number of LCA * Average Salary
1 New York, NY 27,514 $95,191
2 Houston, TX 12,898 $83,099
3 San Francisco, CA 8,320 $99,900
4 San Jose, CA 7,546 $98,296
5 Chicago, IL 7,183 $79,212
6 Atlanta, GA 7,156 $76,568
7 San Diego, CA 5,633 $92,766
8 Sunnyvale, CA 5,026 $97,973
9 Charlotte, NC 4,840 $76,732
10 Boston, MA 4,674 $81,664
11 Redmond, WA 4,557 $98,269
12 Santa Clara, CA 4,503 $99,967
13 Dallas, TX 4,222 $74,860
14 Seattle, WA 4,167 $93,155
15 Mountain View, CA 3,970 $115,899
16 Jersey City, NJ 3,893 $84,861
17 Austin, TX 3,874 $80,804
18 Irving, TX 3,837 $73,623
19 Los Angeles, CA 3,764 $74,782
20 Philadelphia, PA 3,675 $75,410
21 Washington, DC 3,159 $77,757
22 Phoenix, AZ 3,140 $75,330
23 Plano, TX 3,122 $78,172
24 Cupertino, CA 3,052 $101,937
25 Bellevue, WA 2,953 $95,132
26 Irvine, CA 2,736 $81,984
27 Columbus, OH 2,614 $75,509
28 Miami, FL 2,536 $76,269
29 Richmond, VA 2,444 $75,029
30 Pittsburgh, PA 2,345 $76,603
31 Palo Alto, CA 2,293 $108,786
32 Alpharetta, GA 2,266 $74,819
33 Tampa, FL 2,214 $73,826
34 Bloomington, IL 2,164 $68,834
35 Minneapolis, MN 1,928 $77,279
36 Richardson, TX 1,916 $75,802
37 Hartford, CT 1,802 $76,817
38 Fremont, CA 1,800 $79,490
39 Edison, NJ 1,794 $70,576
40 Baltimore, MD 1,790 $72,836
41 Wilmington, DE 1,724 $76,996
42 Brooklyn, NY 1,723 $72,629
43 Milpitas, CA 1,703 $91,783
44 Princeton, NJ 1,665 $74,774
45 Milwaukee, WI 1,643 $79,629
46 Cambridge, MA 1,637 $82,583
47 Jacksonville, FL 1,621 $74,879
48 Bentonville, AR 1,608 $68,507
49 Piscataway, NJ 1,598 $68,691
50 San Antonio, TX 1,561 $73,874

Labor Condition Application (LCA)


17 Jul

2014 Top H1B Visa Sponsors by Work State

Rank Work State Number of LCA* Average Salary
1 California 83,794 $91,967
2 New York 42,522 $88,403
3 Texas 42,179 $78,180
4 New Jersey 29,774 $75,823
5 Illinois 24,493 $76,560
6 Massachusetts 16,884 $83,259
7 Pennsylvania 16,769 $76,990
8 Washington 15,489 $93,715
9 Florida 15,264 $74,756
10 Georgia 13,983 $74,786
11 Virginia 13,113 $76,651
12 North Carolina 11,664 $76,266
13 Ohio 11,637 $75,722
14 Michigan 11,529 $74,777
15 Maryland 8,124 $76,500
16 Connecticut 7,441 $82,224
17 Minnesota 7,189 $76,676
18 Arizona 6,381 $78,029
19 Wisconsin 5,048 $79,226
20 Missouri 4,987 $76,864
21 Colorado 4,888 $78,306
22 Indiana 4,270 $79,484
23 Tennessee 4,264 $75,061
24 Oregon 3,711 $84,783
25 District of Columbia 3,682 $78,046
26 Delaware 3,170 $78,669
27 Iowa 2,604 $81,680
28 Arkansas 2,440 $75,989
29 Kansas 2,231 $78,258
30 Utah 1,942 $72,919
31 Kentucky 1,885 $87,328
32 Rhode Island 1,792 $78,682
33 South Carolina 1,671 $70,193
34 Louisiana 1,660 $75,990
35 Oklahoma 1,575 $71,473
36 New Hampshire 1,557 $81,009
37 Alabama 1,486 $77,885
38 Nebraska 1,388 $84,318
39 Nevada 1,119 $80,777
40 New Mexico 854 $89,273
41 Maine 672 $93,606
42 Mississippi 668 $86,690
43 Idaho 635 $75,178
44 Hawaii 615 $69,642
45 West Virginia 518 $104,454
46 North Dakota 469 $97,981
47 Vermont 262 $75,876
48 South Dakota 261 $86,207
49 Alaska 259 $84,970
50 Montana 156 $84,496
51 Wyoming 127 $97,566

Labor Condition Application (LCA)


17 Jul

Top H1B Visa Jobs by Job Title

 

Rank Job Title # of LCA* Average Salary
1 Programmer Analyst 33,861 $65,415
2 Software Engineer 15,659 $90,240
3 Computer Programmer 11,263 $64,105
4 Systems Analyst 8,710 $68,560
5 Technology Lead – Us 7,853 $77,031
6 Technology Analyst – Us 7,683 $66,842
7 Business Analyst 5,711 $67,761
8 Computer Systems Analyst 5,039 $70,970
9 Software Developer 5,019 $82,105
10 Senior Consultant 4,324 $102,125
11 Assistant Professor 4,195 $98,952
12 Senior Software Engineer 3,659 $106,447
13 Consultant 3,474 $81,508
14 Physical Therapist 3,232 $68,914
15 Systems Engineer – Us 2,617 $63,184
16 Project Manager 2,394 $84,636
17 Research Associate 2,317 $52,608
18 Database Administrator 2,175 $69,483
19 Computer Systems Engineer 2,155 $63,342
20 Project Manager – Us 2,061 $92,046
21 Accountant 1,950 $51,376
22 Computer Programmer Analyst 1,948 $68,662
23 Associate 1,700 $100,994
24 Consultant – Us 1,680 $77,987
25 Business Systems Analyst 1,525 $72,810
26 Senior Software Developer 1,472 $95,671
27 Lead Engineer 1,455 $69,102
28 Technical Test Lead – Us 1,377 $72,565
29 Software Development Engineer 1,370 $105,105
30 Postdoctoral Fellow 1,348 $46,044
31 Programmer/Analyst 1,339 $67,159
32 Computer Programmers 1,286 $63,502
33 Market Research Analyst 1,284 $50,447
34 Computer Programmer/Configurer 2 1,254 $65,526
35 Test Analyst – Us 1,235 $65,889
36 Pharmacist 1,229 $117,272
36 Financial Analyst 1,229 $68,154
38 Systems Engineer 1,182 $78,500
39 Manager 1,175 $123,536
40 Analyst 1,139 $72,382
41 Quality Assurance Analyst 1,136 $65,112
42 Technology Architect – Us 1,132 $96,317
43 Postdoctoral Research Associate 1,085 $46,892
44 Mechanical Engineer 1,045 $70,246
45 Research Fellow 966 $53,821
46 Postdoctoral Associate 926 $46,553
47 Systems Administrator 919 $68,029
48 Senior Programmer Analyst 912 $86,502
49 Associate Consultant – Us 907 $66,428
50 Application Developer 899 $76,857

 

Labor Condition Application (LCA)

17 Jul

2014 Top H1B Visa Petition Status

2014 H1B Visa Report: Top H1B Visa Petition Status

 

Rank Petition Status Number of LCA Average Salary
1 Certified 382,767 $81,825
2 Certified-Withdrawn 35,399 $82,683
3 Denied 12,117 $78,528
4 Withdrawn 11,477 $84,421
5 Pending Quality And Compliance Review – Unassigned 15 $95,300
26 Jun

Importing Gas Station Workers

Texas is the second biggest state in the nation who permanently employs foreign workers.
Reports show that Texas chronically suffers from deficiency of qualified workforce, leading with computer and math related occupations.
In Houston alone, (as of June 2014), there are 150 applications in process, awaiting DOL approval to proceed with “importing” foreign workers to Houston, TX: Computer Systems Analysts(24), Computer Programmers(17), Mechanical Engineers(15), Software Developers(12), Computer Occupations(7), Database Administrator(6), Financial Analysts(5), Petroleum Engineers(5), Chemists(4), Operations Research(4), etc.
gas-import

For those who are not familiar with the PERM process, here is a brief overview:

Program Electronic Review Management (PERM) is the system used for obtaining labor certification and is the first step for certain foreign nationals in obtaining an employment-based immigrant visa (“green card”). This is also known as PERM labor certification.
Before a U.S. employer can file an immigration petition for a foreign worker with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the employer must first obtain an approved labor certification from the Department of Labor (DOL).

The DOL must certify to the USCIS both that there are not sufficient U.S. workers able, willing, qualified, and available to accept the job offered the alien at the prevailing wage for that occupation in the area of intended employment, and that employment of the foreign worker will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of similarly employed U.S. workers.
Prior to filing the permanent labor certification application, the employer must conduct recruitment of U.S. workers for the job being offered.
The following mandatory recruitment activities are required for all applications involving professional and non-professional occupations which are not filed for Schedule A positions or Special Handling:
Job Order – The employer must place a job order with the local SWA for a period of 30 days. Advertisements in Newspaper or Professional Journals – The employer must place an advertisement in a newspaper of general circulation on two different Sundays. In-House Posting – The employer must post an internal job posting (also called a notice of filing) with all DOL required information for a period of 10 consecutive business days. As additional advertizing employer may utilize Job fairs, Employer’s web site, Job search web site other than employer’s, On-campus recruiting (usually for positions requiring no experience, Trade or professional organizations, Private employment firms, An employee referral program, if it includes identifiable incentives, A notice of the job opening at a campus placement office, if the job requires a degree but no experience, Local and ethnic newspapers, to the extent they are appropriate for the job opportunity, Radio and television advertisements.
Advertisements must not contain additional job requirements not normally required for the position (unless there is a demonstrated business need) and cannot contain wages or terms of employment that are less favorable than those being offered to the alien beneficiary.
Once the job has been advertised, the employer must interview U.S. applicants that have met the minimum requirements for the position. If the employer rejects U.S. workers that meet the minimum qualifications, employer must document why in its recruitment report. The employer must have a lawful, job-related reason for rejecting a minimally qualified U.S. worker, and include that reason in the recruitment report.

Obviously, this is a very long, complicated and costly process. Bottom line, employers have to prove to DOL that they have done everything in their power to reach qualified American workers, but were not able to find a qualified candidate.

DOL reports show that it is apparent that we are lacking American IT brains, and India has a surplus. So you ask yourself: shouldn’t we get in an accelerated mode and train US candidates, so the void could be filled internally?
My answer is YES. However, that is a subject for another discussion.

What is mind boggling  is that so many employer claim that they can not find qualified US workers in occupations where there should be plenty of supply. Please take a look at the following examples:

ABIR BUSINESS INC. DBA STOP N ZIP FOOD MART – |HOUSTON, TEXAS, 77015 | Stated they could not find a gas station attendant in the US, even though the annual salary offered was $ 49,587. Their application was certified, and the worker is from India.

STAR PROTECTION AGENCY LLC – | HOUSTON, TEXAS, 77024 | Stated they could not find a security guard in the US. They planned to hire a worker from Nepal. However, the application was denied.

DRAGER’S INDUSTRIES, INC. (not to be confused with Dräger or Draeger), – | PEARLAND, TEXAS, 77581 | Stated they could not find a welder in the US. The pay offered was $19.50/hr., and they planned to hire a worker from Mexico. The application was denied.

25 Jun

Top Green Card Sponsors

GREENCARD  

Even though it has changed its color, the “green card” is a proof that the owner is a lawful permanent resident.

 

As such, he or she has been legitimately granted immigration benefits, which include authorization to live and work in the United States.  Whether obtained by a green card lottery, through employment, or eb2, green card holders are here to stay. Green card rules apply to the holder status and appropriate liberties.

After doing a bit of math, and just computing the top 100 sponsors, the numbers are pretty darn impressive.

In one year the influx of more than 11,000 foreign workers pays total of annual salaries: $112,489,602,220. Yes, more than 100 billion dollars a year.

Following is a list of numbered top 100 USA sponsors for FY 2013.

Rank Green Card Sponsor # of Petitions Average Salary
1 Intel 1173 $134,173
2 Microsoft 622 $118,351
3 Oracle America 541 $116,868
4 Google 329 $129,876
5 Cisco Systems 311 $113,537
6 Amazon Corporate 288 $119,069
7 Cognizant Technology Solutions 274 $101,201
8 Apple 225 $130,602
9 Hcl America 207 $109,506
10 Yahoo! 192 $117,921
11 Deloitte Consulting 191 $125,242
12 Qualcomm 172 $107,194
13 Ibm 172 $95,368
14 Bank Of America 171 $107,289
15 Ebay 168 $115,646
16 Kforce 150 $95,063
17 Qualcomm Technologies 144 $111,430
18 Pricewaterhousecoopers 129 $107,904
19 Ernst & Young 127 $128,498
20 Mastech 124 $85,303
21 Vmware 121 $118,914
22 Broadcom 118 $113,450
23 Hcl Global Systems 118 $86,537
24 Hewlett-packard Company 105 $109,862
25 Nvidia 103 $118,856
26 Csc Covansys 97 $87,555
27 Verizon Communications, & All Its Subsidiaries & Affiliates 96 $92,301
28 Koch Foods Of Alabama 96 $18,565
29 Facebook 95 $124,280
30 Htc Global Services 91 $81,827
31 Goldman, Sachs 89 $156,967
32 Emc 88 $113,243
33 Micron Technology 87 $77,882
34 Compunnel Software Group 87 $76,994
35 Apex Technology Systems 86 $75,527
36 Synopsys 84 $135,704
37 Dgn Technologies 84 $90,342
38 Wal-mart Associates 82 $99,084
39 Ericsson 82 $96,167
40 Paypal 78 $112,483
41 Los Angeles Unified School District 78 $44,163
42 Motorola Mobility 77 $105,297
43 Capgemini Financial Services Usa 77 $99,230
44 Randstad Technologies 75 $107,938
45 Kpmg 75 $100,273
46 Manhattan Associates 75 $94,344
47 Case Farms 74 $18,005
48 Deloitte & Touche 73 $117,795
49 Salesforce.com 73 $117,475
50 Headstrong Services 71 $92,884
51 Morgan Stanley 69 $130,759
52 Infosys 68 $79,664
53 Jpmorgan Chase 67 $127,364
54 Sapient 66 $115,329
55 Adobe Systems 65 $128,484
56 Bloomberg 65 $102,535
57 System Soft Technologies 65 $88,247
58 Polaris Software Lab (india) 62 $88,286
59 Capgemini 61 $113,372
60 Rjt Compuquest 61 $98,777
61 Samsung Telecommunications America 60 $107,230
62 Patni Americas 57 $87,538
63 Indus Valley Consultants 56 $65,593
64 Marvell Semiconductor 54 $106,698
65 At&T, And All Of Its Subsidiaries And Affiliates 54 $102,231
66 Amdocs 54 $95,160
67 Itech Us 54 $90,550
68 Cts Technical Services 53 $105,175
69 Symantec 52 $122,571
70 Wipro 52 $109,257
71 Xerox Business Services 52 $95,475
72 Technosoft 52 $73,312
73 Apogee Medical Group, Virginia, Pc 51 $187,823
74 Linkedin 51 $123,123
75 Brocade Communications Systems 51 $111,634
76 Horizon Technologies 51 $104,288
77 Ntt Data 50 $96,464
78 3i Infotech 50 $96,209
79 Epic Systems 50 $90,400
80 Isync Solutions 50 $86,985
81 Populous Group 49 $104,243
82 Abbott Laboratories 49 $99,240
83 First Tek 49 $91,882
84 Mphasis 49 $84,489
85 V-soft Consulting Group 48 $70,656
86 Marlabs 47 $105,613
87 Oracle Financial Services Software 47 $101,475
88 Globalfoundries 46 $114,188
89 Dell Usa 46 $111,561
90 Vedicsoft Solutions 46 $96,163
91 Fmr 45 $93,405
92 Virgo 45 $85,200
93 Fort Worth Independent School District 45 $48,599
94 Capital One Services 44 $118,037
95 A2z Development Center 43 $133,323
96 Advanced Micro Devices 43 $115,600
97 CitiGroup 42 $141,905
98 The University Of Iowa 42 $100,661
99 Techdemocracy 42 $89,376
100 Compuware 42 $76,326

Read more articles about green card related topics at Delatorem.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

The H1b visa program permits employers to provisionally employ foreign workers in the United States on a nonimmigrant basis in jobs such as special professions or as models of eminent merit and aptitude. A specialty profession requires the hypothetical and practical application of an entity with specific knowledge and a bachelors degree or the comparable in the specific specialty. H1b visa requirements depend on a sponsor (a company in the US), who needs to submit a Labor Condition Application. H1b visa status depends on DOL and the USCIS (Immigration and Naturalization Service) decisions. PERM foreign labor applicaton and certification is obtained via US Department of Labor.Wondering how to check status of PERM application? The company’s attorney states that the labor certification application was filed in January. It would take 45-60 days to approve. Now, 5 months past, we haven’t heard anything. I asked the lawyer, what the situation was. He said there was no way to check what’s happening under the new rules. You, your attorney and your Human Resources can log into the system, find the case number and check the status. My lawyer said he filed electronically. I will check with Human Resources. Just type the ETA Case Number and it yields the standing and the file date. In general, how long does it take for a case to be set to “in growth”? Possibly, the next day after answering the sponsorship survey, the case status transformed. Individuals typically can’t check PERM standing virtually.

25 Jun

H1B Visa

h1b visa The H-1B visa program limits the number of cap-subject petitions to 85,000 each fiscal year. But why thousands of new LCA petitions for H-1B visa could still be filed after the cap was reached? Why over 300,000 LCA petitions were filed each fiscal year?

Petitions for new H-1B employment are exempt from the annual cap if the beneficiaries will work at:

  • Institutions of higher education
  • Non-profit entities related or affiliated to a higher education institution
  • Non-profit research organizations or governmental research organizations

Petitions filed on behalf of current or former H-1B workers who have been counted previously against the cap also do not count toward the cap. Accordingly, USCIS will continue to process FY 2013 and FY 2014 petitions filed to:

  • Extend the amount of time a current H-1B worker may remain in the United States.
  • Change the terms of employment for current H-1B workers.
  • Allow current H-1B workers to change employers.
  • Allow current H-1B workers to work concurrently in a second H-1B position.
  • Allow recapture of the time that H-1B workers spent outside the U.S.
  • Change status back to H-1B from other status like H-4 or F-1.